“Moves” are rhetoric
devices used by writers to reach a specific goal in writing. “They say, I say”
provides a few examples of the most common moves most writers tend to use.
One of
these moves is called Something you Say.
Something you Say is presented as
being the opinion of the writer. It is the part of the paragraph where the writer
describes its own thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about their specific subject.
This move is used very commonly as it was very easy to find it amongst our
readings. In Navigating Genres, the
writers presents this when he writes “I think it’s time to try our hand at
approaching genre...” (24). As you can see, Dirk begins this sentence with “I”
to inform the reader that what he is was about to say is coming from Dirk,
himself, and not a text book.
The
second move I will be discussing is Introducing
Standard Views. Introducing Standard Views is when the writer incorporates
a common subject and their writing piece. Whether it is a common belief,
ideology, quote, or fact, it will discuss −as the name implies− standard views.
Unlike the previous move this one was a little more challenging to find with in
our readings. Carroll manages to present this move in her writing pieces, Backpacks vs. Briefcases. As Carroll
discusses personal interactions with in people, she writes “we have all heard
that you can’t judge a book by its cover, but in fact, we do it all the time”
(38). In this sentence, Carroll brought up a standard view known by the general
public, and then added her two cents in by commenting on the phrase.
The third
move mentioned in the appendix is Explaining
Quotations. In shorter words Explaining Quotation technically means
analysis. It is when a writer further explains and analyses a quote. Like the first
move described above, this one is also very common. All writers need to provide
evidence in their papers, therefore need to provide an analysis as well. This is seen in Carroll’s writing piece once
again. After introducing a quote to one of her paragraphs she follows by
writing “In other words (…)”, explains the meaning of the quote (40). That is
basically the just of Explaining
Quotations. After, introducing a quotation in a paragraph the writer must
further explaining by breaking it down or provided further information on the quote
used.
The fourth
move that will be discussed from the appendix is Introducing Objections informally. As a writer you know many
readers will not agree with your argument no matter how well supported it is.
For this reason, writers use something called a counter argument. Introducing
Objection Informally is similar to a counter argument. The writer discussed
certain objection one may have of their topic and defends it. For example, in
page 33 Elbow writes “But does freewriting or uncensored, generative writing
really enhance creative first-order thinking?” By stating this, Elbow is
challenging the readers to question his claim, but then establishes credibility
by providing evidence to support his point of view.
Last but
not least, the fifth move I will be discussing from the appendix is (drum roll
please), Agreeing and Disagreeing. As the name infers, it is when the writer discusses
why someone might agree with something, but then explains his/her reasons for
disagreeing with it. An example of this is shown in the So what who Cares reading. In page 53, the write wrote “Although
answering the “who cares?” is crucial, in many cases it is not enough,
especially if you are writing for (…)”The author first begins by saying
something positive about the topic, “it is crucial” however, he/she then
disagrees by saying it is not as important standing alone.
Now let’s
get into moves not described in the appendix.
The first
non-appendix related move is give me directions. In give me directions the
reader provides information to their reader in form of directions. For example,
Carroll provides an example of this in her subtopic called beginning to
analyze. Her first sentence of this paragraph is “once you have established the
context for the rhetoric you are analyzing, you can being to think about (…).”
In his paragraph Carrol is directing the reader through a process. She is
providing the reader with directions to successfully analyze.
The second
non-appendix move is the checklist. Similar to that of give me directions, the
writer uses a checklist to direct the reader in the direction they want. The checklist
is a list of thing presented in a form of bullet points to provide a guide for the
reader. For example, in page 66 Boyd inserts a list of bullet points as a check
list for reports.
The
third move I will discuss is engaging the reader. There are different ways to
engage a reader to a writing piece. The check list with questions of how to do
or how the reader did something could be one, but a specific type if when the
writer forces the reader to engage. If they are discussing a confusing topic
and then provide a “you try”, or any form of hand on hand practice. A good
example of this is in page 52 from So
What Who Cares. The author provides a list of practice examples so that the
reader can understand the topic with more clarity.
The
fourth move seen in many writing pieces is the use of italics. Many authors italicize different word to
create emphasis and make the word stand out to the reader. For example, in Navigating Genres Dirk states “people
learned how to do small talk to ease
the social discomfort of the large group (…).” In this sentence Dirk italicized
small talk to emphasize that it is the word of importance and the focus of that
particular sentence.
The
final and last move I will be discussing is the long quotation effect. This
move is when the writer is inputting a long quotation, and changes the spacing
and possibly the font of that the specific words in the quotation. An example of
this is in How to Read like a Writer page 83.
Hi Susli, I like how clear you are when describing the move for something you Say,but I felt like it was lacking the WHY, like you said many authors use this move because it simple and effective but the reader needs to understand why this move is so popular. I really liked you transition sentence from the moves in the appendix to the others its fun and it certainly engaged me. you started off very strong when describing the moves but I think you were running out of time because it feels like the last moves were too short and needed more explaining. Overall I think it does the job, it was easy to read and straight to the point
ReplyDeleteHi Susli, your analysis of the specific moves used in the ‘They Say, I Say’ article, as well as moves in other articles was extremely clear. However, I really believe including more emphasis on why you think the author used this move would have certainly enhanced your PB2B. This would also influence me as a reader, why those moves were used and why it’s effective. Nevertheless, your structure of your writing was not confusing at all and very easy to follow. Great work!
ReplyDelete