Monday, May 30, 2016

Self-Analysis

Susli Leon
Zack De Piero
Writing 2
May 29, 2016
                                                                        Self-Analysis

            Within each and every genre there are conventions that target a certain audience. For this reason, to transform an abortion article into a youth’s brochure and an adult’s bible, I had to not only change the setting of the article, but also change the structure, the diction, and the tone. The goal was to eliminate any trace of the conventions of the abortion research article, without changing its meaning. To make this transition, I had to manipulate the perspective of my targeted audience by incorporated my own word choice, imagery, tone, and many other conventions that each transformation required.
            For my youth’s transformation I decided to create a young teen’s clinic brochure. I knew that because of my intense topic my targeted audience had to be limited to young children in middle school. My peers helped me realize that targeting an audience younger than middle schoolers would have been forced and unrealistic. Due to the high increase of sexual activity in young children, I decided to go with a clinic brochure that would be handed out after a sex-ed class.  For this reason, my brochure is not merely based on abortion, but also has other material that would be offered in a sexual education class. To establish the audience for this brochure, I used specific “Moves” to differentiate this clinical brochure from that of an adult. As a way to emphasize the young teenage audience for this brochure, I concentrated on the wording, the appearance, and the way I presented my information.
            In the brochure I implemented simple wording. Because my brochure is intended for the middle school population, I had to use short simple phrases to explain the topics, and bullet points to eliminate huge paragraphs. By doing so, I made it easier for the younger population to read and understand. As for the appearance, I strayed away from lengthy paragraphs, and boring colors. I had to get the attention of the middle school population, and persuade them to want to read my brochure. For this reason, I used a pop of color and numerous pictures to catch their attention. To explain my information, I used headings and bullet points to make the information they are interested in reading easy to find.  
            The beginning of my brochure begins with the name of the clinic and a friendly picture. The name of the clinic is the same name as the organization that was provided in the abortion research article. The friendly picture provided serves as a way to perceive the clinic as friendly and welcoming to teens. At the bottom of the picture I used the researcher’s name as the Dr.’s name to show that the information from both the research article and the brochure were from her. The brochure then proceeds by incorporating helpful information for teens. The columns are organized from different protective barriers to use in sex, to methods available to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. For this reason, the first column discusses contraceptives, the second column discusses Plan B, and the third discusses abortion.
To stay true to the original article, I incorporated the main focus of Shellenberg’s research in the abortion column. Shellenberg’s main argument concentrated on how stigmas effect the experiences and perspectives women go through abortion. To represent this claim, the abortion column informed girls of the stigmas that surround abortion, as well as the positive and negative effects of abortion. Its purpose is to inform teens of facts about abortion so they are fully informed and un-influenced by stigmas when making an important body decision. To help convey this, I used McCloud’s methods presented in Writing with Pictures. For example, I used choice of moment to decide the information that was important to incorporate and the information that was unnecessary (McCloud 157).
I had to choose which moments discussed by Shellenberg flowed the best with my clinical brochure. Is it more important to include how Shellenberg did her research or the results she got from her research? I decided to include the results of Shellenberg’s research. Shellenberg discovered that the way a community perceives abortion effects the women’s experience with abortion. If a community is religiously against or shameful towards abortion, women will feel guilty and hide the fact that they have had an abortion. After abortion, the community’s response will also cause fear. Women will begin to fear that they will not be able to have another child, as well as that they are unworthy of marriage. To represent all these aspects, I had choose the words I wanted to use in my frame correctly (McCloud 158). In a clinical brochure I cannot speak about religion, nor have a biased opinion about abortion. Which is why I chose to state the stigmas, then state both the pros and cons of abortion to allow women to make their own decisions without any false claims or fears.
For my second transformation, I took in consideration the religious stigmas that were discussed in the article. Because of Schulenburg’s research, it was discovered that religious communities have a negative perspective on abortion, and therefore women who abort have a fear of being punished. To represent this religious effect, I decided that my adult transformation would be a bible. To create the bible effect, I had to do as Losh and Alexander suggested, and change the identity of the research article (Losh 145). I changed the role of the article, and fit the ideas and circumstances into the new genre and audience (Losh 149). How did I do this? Well like in the youth’s transformation, I had to change the word choice and choose a flow that fits best with the image of a bible. The bible usually includes a lot of stories that teach the word of God. In order for the transformation to be effective, I had to change the flow of the research paper into the flow of a story. I made this possible by incorporating a beginning, a middle, and end to my bible transformation. I began with a story of a king, then followed the purpose of the story, which was how the king aborted the child of his wife, and I ended the biblical story with a lesson – how aborting a child was considered murder and thus will not go unpunished.
In order to stay true to the structure of a bible, while incorporating the information from the original article, I had to use transitions, sentence numbers, and dialogue. The transitions, were used to move the biblical story along. For example, I used therefore to infer that the previous part of the story leads you to this specific section. The sentence numbers were used to number of each sentence. In an original bible, all the sentences have number to use as references when orally citing, so I included them to stay true the original structure of a bible. Lastly, I used dialogue to represent the biblical story presented in most common bibles.  

Transforming an abortion article into a clinical brochure and a bible took a lot of trial and error. It was very time consuming to see what information works and what does not. Transforming has a lot, if not almost all, to do with the targeted audience. A clinical brochure for adults would look very different to that of a clinical teenage brochure. For this reason, audience is everything. Knowing your audience guides you through the rest of the transformation. It helps you figure out what information is necessary and which is not, what language is appropriate, how the structure should look, and so much more. Without any knowledge of the preferred targeted audience, transformation like those are rigorous to complete. 

No comments:

Post a Comment